1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ad-work [718]
3 years ago
6

The constitutional age requirement to be eligible to run for the house of representatives is ___ years of age, and for the senat

e it is ___ years of age.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Molodets [167]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is 25 and 30. Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
A social process through which an individual intentionally exerts influence over others to structure their behaviors and relatio
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:

leadership

Explanation:

In the leadership as a social process, the contributions and efforts other make are put towards the attainment of a goal. In this process, social influence is all that is needed to structure people’s behaviors and relationships not power or authority.

These individuals being influenced must not have direct relationship with the leader and there are many paths one can follow to make such influence on people worthwhile.

6 0
3 years ago
List out any five herbs available in your kitchen and use of it.​
Ivenika [448]

Basil. Commonly used in Italian dishes, basil is great for adding flavor to soups and sauces. ...

Cilantro. Cilantro is most common in Mexican and Asian dishes. ...

Dill.  

Mint.  

Oregano  

Parsley (Italian)  

Parsley (Curly)

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
The decision-making strategy that aims for adequate results because optimal results may necessitate excessive expenditure of res
azamat

Answer:

Satisficing

Explanation:

It is a decision making strategy which aimed to purposed a satisfactorily result. Satisficing concentrate on realistic efforts when encountering the task. This strategy aims to focus on the optimal level of solutions. The theory of satisficing was found to be applied in field economics, artificial intelligence, and sociology. Satisficing is a strategy adopted by an organization that seeks to meet the minimal level of expectancies for credits. This contradiction put to maximize the profit by combined attempts that put the organization high demands on the performance crosswise sales, marketing, and other departments.

5 0
3 years ago
A narrator with insight into the minds of all the other characters and a foreknowledge of what was going to happen would be a(n)
Ilya [14]
The answer is an omniscient character
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Are you surprised to learn that fingerprint analysis is actually subjective, not objective?
    10·1 answer
  • Choose the right word to complete each sentence.
    11·2 answers
  • Julian begins seeing a therapist to cope with a number of stressful life events. The therapist does not focus on his childhood o
    14·1 answer
  • Which of Erikson's eight psychosocial stages is the stage in which the healthy developing child begins to plan activities and ma
    10·2 answers
  • What do you think are some of the advantages and disadvantages of alternative sanctions?
    11·2 answers
  • Why are political parties considered an important part of a democratic political system?
    6·2 answers
  • (economy) if elias is willing to pay $50 for one pair of jeans but will only pay $90 for two pairs, then the value of his margin
    14·1 answer
  • Why do hikers attempt to climb mount Everest only during a two week period each year
    15·1 answer
  • Alan has seven United States coin the total value is $.61 what coins and how many of each does he have
    8·1 answer
  • True or false? Hamilton was a supporter of France and helped write many treaties joining France and the US together. *
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!