Evidence for evolution, in other words evidence of common descent, include fossils, which have shown a (fairly) steady change in morphology over time for some species. An example would be horse hooves: we have fossils that show when they were still three toed, then two toed, then one toe in our present day horses. Another piece of evidence is vestigial organs. An example of vestigial organs is wings in some flightless birds, such as the kiwi. Their ancestors used it in order to fly across the marine barrier into New Zealand, but natural selection and random genetic drift made them quickly lose the ability to fly. Nonetheless, they still have their wings, however small. It can be assumed that eventually, their wings would be reduced to small stubs fused to other nearby bones, as has been observed in their cousins.
<span>Vary depending on the distribution of the given feature.</span>
Answer:
The function of the essay's Conclusion is to restate the main argument. It reminds the reader of the strengths of the argument: that is, it reiterates the most important evidence supporting the argument.
Explanation:
hope this helps please give brainlest
The answer is <em><u>not</u></em> Organisms would be classified based only on physical characteristics!!
I strongly feel that it would be....
<em>--the existing classification system may change to accommodate the new information.--</em>
<em>Reason:</em> Some things would not just be classified by appearance. Rather, this would add more possibilities to classification. We know that plants and dogs look nothing alike yet they are still related through the Domain (Eukarya).
I also took this test and relied on the other answer, sadly, it was incorrect.
I hope i could help! Let me know if this is incorrect. ~ Ninja Cat :D
Answer:c.
Explanation:because atp is made threw the citric acid cycle
