Answer:
The major premise is lack of House to pay attention towards the road ahead of him and the rule of contributory negligence. By using this jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced.
Explanation:
- The defendant driver, while he may ultimately be liable if all of the witnesses say he ran the stop sign, will raise the comparative fault of House for failing to keep a proper lookout and failing to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
- The defenses are the same as they would be if the collision was with another car instead of a bicycle.
- House had an ordinary duty to pay attention to the road ahead of him and keep himself and others safe.
- By watching his books and not the traffic, he breached that duty.
- I'm not saying that defense will be successful, but that's what would be alleged by the car's driver as a defense.
- In most states, the damages to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of his/her comparative fault (also known in some jurisdictions as contributory negligence).
- In some states, if the plaintiff's comparative fault is shown to be over 50%, there will be no recovery at all.
Answer:
1. What are some of the things the team at the Forensic Anthropology Lab is able to determine by studying bones?
Some of the things they are able to determine are what kind of prenatal environment they may have had, what kind of childhood they may have had, if it affected their stature, if it affected their dentition, their diet, and even their climate sometimes
2. Based on the individual’s remains discussed in the video, explain how Dr. Ann Ross and her team were able to determine the person died violently?
Due to the damage done to the skull—they found bullet holes. They then passed this information on to the authorities
3. Explain how researchers obtained information about the individual’s race, sex, height and connection with the local area?
They analyzed what they found. They measured, and compared the bones to find the individual’s race, sex, height, and location
.
Explanation:
Answer:
Re-register
Explanation:
GPS to help law enforcement recover stolen vehicles, there are many ways law enforcement agencies can implement GPS tracking to help prevent theft, stop crime, and catch criminals.
GPS tracking can also be used for tracking those under house arrest or for enforcing restraining orders. Convicted criminals serving time under house arrest can wear a tamper-resistant, GPS-enabled ankle cuff.
Some states have specific laws that allow judges and law enforcement to use technology in ways that are intended to protect victims of domestic violence. For example, law enforcement and courts can use Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology to track offenders who have committed domestic violence and stalking.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
i think so i dont study law or so hopefully i helped somehow
