In a typical business, 80% of a company's expenses are for option C: Initial investments.
<h3>
What do you mean by term Initial investments?</h3>
An initial investment is defined as the amount of money that is required for every business in order to start the project.
The initial investment is equal to capital expenditures plus working capital requirement add after-tax proceeds.
Therefore, approximately 80% of portion of total expense is covered by payment of initial investments.
Learn more about Initial investments, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/13540082
#SPJ1
Answer:
Following are the responses to these question.
Explanation:
The goal of most businesses is to achieve the optimum gross profit. Moreover, to achieve this, a well-designed plan or plan deserves to be placed in place. The management needs to ensure that things are done properly and so that they are successful at the same period and therefore do not harm the business. That fast-food giant Mcdonald's is a good example of this. One of McDonald's' franchises in York City recently increased its Big Mac sales from $5,98 to $6,28. Before all this, Macdonalds would have an annual boost.
"During first 4th quarter, the price of Eiffel Tower in the U.s. Increased two percent year on year was still less than price index"
They need businesses like Apple at another end of the continuum. Apple also fired 1,600 filled retail employees to increase its gross profit. "Operating revenue inside the second quarter of 2009 were down $308 million to $334 million...." We were able to boost their earnings by cutting such full-time jobs. "To 8.16 billion u.s. dollars, which is over 7.96 percent estimated, the economy increased by 8.7%.
It doesn't seem to be the right way of achieving performance. It'd be effective to mix the two. Gradual sale rates are an optimal option, not cutting too many roles at once or combination. It is borne in mind that a decrease in the number of jobs is much more work to left workers who can keep them in a demanding working environment. This could mean a dramatic decline in customer support efficiency. Stuff on all sides of the spectrum must be looked at.
Answer:
The present value of the contract is 0.5% higher if the rent is paid at the beginning of the month. That is equal to $11.28 for every $100 of rent.
Explanation:
if the rent is paid at the beginning of the month, the present value of the lease contract will be:
PV = monthly rent x PV annuity due factor
we are not given the monthly rent, but we know the PV annuity due factor for 0.5% and 24 periods = 22.67568
if the rent is paid at the end of the month, the PV = monthly rent x PV ordinary annuity factor
the PV ordinary annuity factor, 0.5%, 24 periods = 22.56287
assuming that the rent is $100 (just to calculate a %), the PV of an annuity due = $2,267.57
the PV of an ordinary annuity = $2,256.29
the difference between them = [($2,267.57 / $2,256.29) - 1] x 100 = 0.5%
Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.
The final payment is <u><em>not </em></u>a fee that contributes to the original cost of leasing an automobile, option B is the correct answer.
<h3 /><h3>How is leasing charged?</h3>
The first payment is, predictably, the same as one month's rent.
A lender or lessor will impose an acquisition fee to offset the costs of establishing a loan or lease agreement.
A disposition fee, sometimes known as a turn-in fee, is a cost associated with returning a rented vehicle.
Therefore, final payment doesn't contribute to leasing a car.
For more information about leasing, refer below
brainly.com/question/1059164