Answer:
c) It caused a decrease in the output of the cash crops in the New World.
Explanation:
The slave trade brought a increase in the output of cash crops in the New World, hence why they were called cash crops. Larger amounts of people in the workforce who require only food, shelter, and clothes on their back, without pay, is cheaper then hiring white workers in the area. This allowed for bare minimum payment to the slaves with large cash deposits entering in. With the end of the slave trade after the American Civil War, the cash-crops had already found other methods to be planted and harvested. These include, but is not limited too, new plowing methods, the cotton gin, etc. The removal of the slave trade made a dent in the pockets individually based on the amount of resources sunk into them, but did not affect in the way that the South believed it will.
~
The Battle of Saratoga. It was a win for the Partriots after they defeated the British in this battle the leader of the British troops, Burgoyne was sent back to England. The win of this battle convinced the French to support the colonists with military aid. The war ended 6 years after this.
Hey there!
The correct answer to your question is "George Washington."
George Washington was the first president of the United States of America.
He started being a president in the year of 1789, and ended being one in the year of 1797. He was the president for 8 years.
I hope this helps you.
Have a great day! :)
Answer:Separate states are less likely to preserve peace with other nations
Explanation: In the excerpt it spoke about foreign countries invading the U.S for whichever the reason may be. Without the use of the Constitution, separate states are in danger.
Answer:
In my opinion, I would be for the U.S. expansion. With the expansion comes opportunities for new jobs, farming, new trading routes, and overall a chance at a new life. Although it is inaccurate to say that I would be in need of a job considering that I did not live at the same, I would assume that those in need of farm land and work would appreciate the movement. If I were a rich man living in the city during the time of expansion, I would still agree with the expansion. Because of the amount of people in search of a job in the city, the streets were crowded, work places were filled to the top, and people were desperate for work. The expansion allows for these people to move and find new work somewhere else that does not interfere with my work. However, we can not overlook the horrible things that came with this movement such as slavery, the deaths of many people, and the basic fact that it was unconstitutional. In perspective, this question could differ depending on the person. I would have been against the expansion if I were an Indian whose home was taken and whose family was being killed by the travelers.
Explanation:
i dont know if this is good i just wrote something do what you will with it