1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sati [7]
3 years ago
15

Mark was a new salesperson in an electronics store. He sold a TV to a customer and accidentally gave a 35% discount. His manager

told him to be careful next time, but did not contact the customer to correct the sale. Then next day, a friend of the original customer came in and wanted to buy the same TV with the same 35% discount.
Should the second customer be allowed to receive the same discount?
Law
1 answer:
Tanya [424]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Yes

Explanation:

The second customer should be allowed the same discount due to the precedent set by the introduction of an agency by ratification.

An Agency by ratification refers to when a principal ratifies the actions of an agent that acted without permission. The principal would then become bound to the action that was performed.

Mark was the agent and when the manager(principal) did not contact the customer to correct the sale, the manager ratified the actions of Mark and so is bound to the discount which means it should be extended to the customer's friend as well.

You might be interested in
What are the different types of courts in America and what authority do they have?
dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:The federal court system has three main levels: district courts (the trial court), circuit courts which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, the final level of appeal in the federal system.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
A. Do students and adults have the same rights?
SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:no

Explanation: because we teens or kids are not so mature yet than adults and there's things not appropriate for our age that adults do:)

3 0
4 years ago
The Framers of the Constitution originally left voter rights and suffrage up to
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

The United States Constitution did not originally define who was eligible to vote, allowing each state to determine who was eligible.

Explanation:

sorry my computer went blank

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me with my assignment pls it’s legal issues HELP
choli [55]

Answer:

Yessss

Explanation:

Show me the picture

3 0
3 years ago
Hi if you answer good for you
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

ight then :D

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ade was arrested for burglary and stealing from several homes in the city. He pled not guilty, and was tried by a jury on one of
    8·1 answer
  • One night, Alvin entered a convenience store intending to rob it. When he entered, he shoved a gun in the store clerk’s face and
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following demonstrates proper business etiquette?
    15·1 answer
  • In an)<br> primary, people vote directly for a candidate.
    13·1 answer
  • Select the statement that indicates retaliatory proctectionism
    15·1 answer
  • All federal statutory laws are part of the
    14·2 answers
  • What is Cold-calling in marketing and finance?
    13·1 answer
  • What do you believe caused Manson to become a criminal?
    9·1 answer
  • Is this statement true or false? Napoleon’s rule made Europeans love France and ended any desire they had to rule themselves. It
    9·1 answer
  • In Missouri, the insurer must keep a copy of all replacement documents for what period of time?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!