Pardon- is there a way you can show a picture instead? I can help you
Answer:
Explanation:
White collar crime refers to the crimes that are committed by business men and government employees whereas cyber crimes are committed by hackers, terrorists and others to invade the host computer and network system to derive the information.
The purpose of white collar crime is to not to defame somebody but some cyber crimes exhibit a motive to intentionally harm the reputation of the victim.
The white collar crime can be detected in terms of examination of financial accounting analysis and sale and purchase of goods and services but cyber crime remains undetected due to use of unknown devices to commit the offences the IP address and other required identification proofs cannot be found.
Money laundering and ponzi schemes are the examples of the white collar crimes and hacking, email spoofing are the examples of cyber crime.
Answer:
unethical
1. because everyone should be treated the same as the other.
2. because it is wrong to persuade the prosecutor even if they are friends or not.
3.if the client has done something wrong then he should be treated nicer he should be treated normally as everyone else even if the lawyer is friends with the prosecutor
Explanation:
Answer:
A lo largo de la historia y hasta el surgimiento del movimiento feminista, las mujeres se encontraron en un lugar relegado en la sociedad. Varios son los ejemplos de esta situación, entre los que podemos mencionar:
-el sometimiento ideológico, al prohibirseles el voto hasta bien entrado el siglo XX. Hasta hace 100 años atrás, las mujeres no tenían la posibilidad de expresarse en las urnas.
-las mujeres, en sus trabajos, aun hoy en día sufren discriminación salarial: cobran menos que los hombres por el mismo trabajo realizado.
-la total dependencia de los labores domésticos, los cuales son otorgados en forma egoísta a la mujer por parte del hombre. La mujer muchas veces ocupa un rol de "sirvienta" al servicio del hombre, completando todos los quehaceres de la casa sin ayudas.
-el sometimiento económico, por el cual en el pasado no se permitía a la mujer trabajar, con lo cual se la hacia absolutamente dependiente económicamente del hombre.
-la desigualdad en los puestos de poder entre hombres y mujeres, la cual se ve explicitada en la proporción de mujeres con altos cargos políticos en comparación con la cantidad de hombres en los mismos.
INTERESTS PROTECTED
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.
