In this case, one has to check on some of the issues which had been addressed first by Hoover and later relate them and see how they could be addressed by Coolidge and Harding and the techniques used by Harding also realized hence the way to address this case . For instance, Hoover had tackled issues based on economic and social development, therefore, these are similar issues to be related to the resolving powers of Harding and Coolidge. For instance, Coolidge and Harding talked much and had a lot of approaches to solving issues, for instance they used policy approach techniques to solve such issues, for instance the economic policy that led to economic growth, growth in the constitutional government among other things, hence the way to go about this case. Explanation: In this regard, the achievements of Coolidge and Harding have been realized and therefore there is need address the issue which Hoover dealt with and refer them to how Coolidge and Harding could have dealt with them, hence the reason as to why using the policy approach to solving issues has been proposed in this case.
Answer: The intended differences were The framers intended the Senate to be an independent body of responsible citizens however, they moved to divide these powers between the Senate and the president.
Explanation:
Popular views of the property rights & marriage created a problem in which women and slaves were not seen as truly independent people. Therefore, they were not really party to the social contract laid out in the Declaration of Independence.
There is not definite or concrete evidence that any god exists. God is just a placebo people use to rid themselves of their insecurities. The only "evidence" of god is the bible, however the only "evidence" that the bible is a valid book is that god wrote it. This is called circular logic, it does not work.
The existence of the christian god is most definitely not valid.
Their god is described as omnipotent and omnibenevolent.
Omnipotent = Capable of evil
Omnibenevolent = Not capable of evil
Using this definition to describe someone has the same amount of accuracy as saying that there can be a square circle.
Another contradiction is the myth of free will in the bible. The christian god has apparently given everyone free will, yet he is all-knowing. This means that he knows exactly how you will live your life, moment by moment. This is a contradiction, if he is all-knowing, then you do not have free will.
Overall, there is completely no definite and concrete-evidence that god exists. In fact, it is more probable that he does not exist because he, himself is a paradox.
