Some say that I am the finest general that America has produced. Who am I?

History

1 answer:

Lisa [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

William Tecumseh Sherman

Explanation:

American soldier, businessman, educator, and author. He served as a general in the Union Army during the American Civil War (1861–65), receiving recognition for his command of military strategy as well as criticism for the harshness of the scorched earth policies he implemented in conducting total war against the Confederate States. British military theorist and historian.

You might be interested in

Why did the two groups fight in the american revolution

vaieri [72.5K]

By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, trouble was brewing in America. Parliament (England's Congress) had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists did not like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war
Most Americans disagreed. They believed that England had fought the expensive war mostly to strengthen its empire and increase its wealth, not to benefit its American subjects. Also, Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.

4 0

3 years ago

List the organs that are in your body system. Immune system

ira [324]

Answer:

Thymus, Bone marrow, Spleen, Lymphoid tissue “clumps”, Lymph vessels, Lymph nodes, Tonsils, Mucous membranes,

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Why would a department that is traditionally focused on domestic issues become involved in foreign policy-making

Mariana [72]

A department that is traditionally focused on domestic issues could become involved in foreign policy-making because of two main reasons:

It can regulate a good or service given internationally. For example, it can be clothes or technological devices.

Foreign policy-making (or foreign relations), also regulates behavior that could have an international consequence. For example, it could be a business that contaminates the environment.

6 0

3 years ago

50 points BTW if you have any social's list them down so that you can help me with history.

Serjik [45]

what did you mean 

are you gone crazy 
oops sorry:)

3 0

2 years ago

3) Is historical revisionist text important in the way we learn our history? How so?

Margaret [11]

Answer:

Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.

At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:

the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents

attributing false conclusions to books and sources

manipulating statistical data

deliberately mis-translating texts

This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.

8 0

3 years ago