1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amiraneli [1.4K]
3 years ago
15

Which event proved to be the end of the Federalists party?

History
2 answers:
Fofino [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

2 the election of Thomas Jefferson

USPshnik [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

4, the War of 1812.

Explanation:

The Federalist Party came to an end with the War of 1812 due to the Hartford Convention.

You might be interested in
Which is NOT true about the legislative branch?
Tanya [424]
The answer to this is choice A
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following contributed to the start of civil wars and Mali's decline?
dexar [7]

Struggles over the line of succession, is the right answer.

The empire of Mali was founded by Sundiata Keita around 1235 C.E when he united the tribes of the Malinke people. Over a course of time, Mali empire became stronger and took over surrounding kingdoms including the Ghana Empire. The empire began to lose its power in the 1400s ( began to lose its control along the edges of its borders) and finally collapsed in the 1600 C.E. Musa Mansa was the most famous ruler of the empire after whose death, his five sons divided what was left of the empire between them which resulted in the complete downfall of the Mali Empire.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what are the reasons for the lack of Indian unity in fighting Europeans was that the Indians were descended from different peopl
kap26 [50]

There's multiple reasons for the lack of unity between the Indian tribes against the European invasion and expansion on their territory. The Indians were divided into multiple groups, some of which had already had problems and bad blood between them, so alliances between tribes like that were not the first choice in mind. Also, the Europeans played well tactically, by promising some of the tribes certain things if they ally with them, so once the Europeans managed to get what they wanted they were turning against their Indian allies who were pretty much isolated bu that point because of their actions. The conquering of new territories by the Europeans also was very big factor, because they managed to cut the connections between the tribes, thus not allowing them to be able to create alliances and be united against them.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Giving out 35 pts to who ever can anser this question.
mariarad [96]

Answer:

its is all true all above the question

7 0
3 years ago
Plz help me. thank u!!!!!!!!
Rus_ich [418]
The answer is U.S President. Hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What innovation made assembly lines more efficient?
    14·1 answer
  • What were women encouraged to do during World War II?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the role of family in colonial life?
    11·2 answers
  • Which countries had NO imperialistic (empire-building) motives for entering World War II? Russia United States Great Britain Ger
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is true of population and population density in East Asia?
    14·1 answer
  • Which name was given to the foreign policy adopted by President Theodore Roosevelt in Latin America?
    5·2 answers
  • This group was largely responsible for fanning the flames of revolution during the War for Independence.`
    12·1 answer
  • What made the Constitution so popular? In what ways did the government outlined in the Constitution differ
    10·1 answer
  • This passage comes from a white coffee planter named P. J. Laborie. He wrote this book to share his expertise with other Britons
    7·1 answer
  • We’ll look in greater detail at all of the literary techniques involved in speech composition later on in the course, but for no
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!