According to the text, "War is rarely about good against evil". Explain your understanding about this idea. *

1 answer:

4 0

Most of the time war is started over a country’s want for power or more land, it’s not often that a war’s main focus is that the opposing side is morally “bad”. In WW2 we often look back and see it through the Lens of the Allied forces fighting against the evil Axis powers but almost if not all of the conflict was started by the axis powers trying to obtain land, it was only later when people learned about the interment camps and horrible human rights violations that anyone really though of WW2 as a fight against evil.
Wars tend to be interpreted very differently depending on the side you ask since a lot of the time both or neither side is fully morally correct in their reasons for fighting.

Hope that helped!

You might be interested in

Why did it seem likely that the allies would lose in early 1942

UNO [17]

The Second World War was history's largest and most significant armed conflict. It served as the breeding ground for the modern structure of security and intelligence, and for the postwar balance of power that formed the framework for the Cold War. Weapons, materiel, and actual combat, though vital to the Allies' victory over the Axis, did not alone win the war.

8 0

3 years ago

Whom did the israelites look to for stability and leadership during their exile from Israel

erastova [34]

Answer:

Moses

Explanation:

God had commanded (Moses) to take his people to the promise land he had for his people but because if their foolishness they had to wonder in the wilderness for 40 yrs, after the 40 yrs it was mostly a new generation so then the new generation kept traveling to their promise land. All the Israelite's looked up to Moses, and in the bible it say's a cloud in form if pillar would guide them during the day and a pillar of fire in the night.

4 0

3 years ago

Why do questions about being a polygamist or an anarchist seem out of place?

balandron [24]

Polygamy is having more than one wife or husband at once, and anarchism is the rejection of the state or any other type of authority when organizing human societies.

Both types of behaviour are frowned upon by our society, to the point that they can be considered taboo. A taboo is an implicit (although sometimes it can be explicit, like through the enactment of a law) prohibition of something, because it is believed that the act goes against the agreed cultural or religious beliefs of a community. Establishing those kind of limits helps communities to be more organized and to have a stronger sense of "belonging." On the other hand, it can isolate those who think differently and cause the community to be closed to new ideas.

8 0

3 years ago

American colonists felt they were subjected to a tyrannical king,as a result, what elements did they put into the declaration of

tankabanditka [31]

Your answer is B: A Bill of Rights and an announcement they would establish a republic based upon hope this helps :D

5 0

3 years ago

Choose three congressional powers discussed in this section and indicate why the framers gave these powers to congress rather th

Anna [14]

The three congressional powers are:
Expressed powers, which are directly written in constitution
Implied powers, which are not directly written in constituion but lies within the scope of influence and
Inherited Powers, which is held by all governments.
These powers is placed in the hand of the Congress in order to create a balance of power between the Congress and the house.

5 0

3 years ago