All categories

3 years ago

GIVING BRAINLIEST!! Rewrite the sentence below, correcting the problem of incorrect omission.

English

1 answer:

uysha [10]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

ASTRONOMERS ON THE WHOLE UNDERSTAND SOLAR SYSTEM BETTER THAN CHEMISTS

Explanation:

HOPE ITS CORRECT, AND HOPE IT HELPS

You might be interested in

Which images in the poem “We Wear the Mask” best portray an ironic contrast?

professor190 [17]

Can you maybe attach the file to the question?

7 0

2 years ago

Which sound device is present in lines three and four?

12345 [234]

The correct answer is: [A]:

_________________________________________

" assonance " .

_________________________________________

Note: Lines 3 and 4 ; as follows:

_________________________________________

" And many an eye has dance to see

That banner in the sky ; "

_________________________________________

Note that "assonance" refers to the "repetition of vowel sounds" ; that occur "with" words that are close by.

_________________________________________

Note the following words that in "lines 3 and 4" that contain that;

in bold font; as follows:

________________________________________

" And many an eye has dance to see

That banner in the sky ; "

_______________________________________

The presents of "repetition of [a] vowel sound" is quite evident within "lines 3 and 4" — as shown above.

{Note: Try reading the lines aloud and notice 'vowel sounds' that are indicated bold font and underlined — as shown above.}.

_______________________________________

"Alliteration" would be incorrect; since "alliteration" would refer to the present of the repetition of the same consonant sounds; or the same vowel sounds; at the beginning of the first syllables of, words that follow each other—as well as words that appear close together. There is no evidence of this in "lines 3 and 4" of the given passage.

We can rule out "end rhyme" ; since "see" and "sky" do not "rhyme" —nor do "dance to sea" and "in the sky"— which occur at the end of lines 3 and 4.

We can rule out "onomatopoeia" — since there is no evidence of the use of words that sound like themselves (i.e. no evidence of words such as "rattle, jolt, murmur, gargle, buzz, chirp — within "lines 3 and 4."}.

______________________________________

Hope this is helpful to you!

Wishing you the best!

______________________________________

3 0

3 years ago

When you compare two texts, you do more than find what is similar or different. You should also draw conclusions about

lubasha [3.4K]

When comparing texts by the writer the similarities and differences conclude about the writing ability of the author. Thus option D is correct.

<h3>What is writing ability?</h3>

The complete question is attached to the image below.

Writing ability is the writer's capability and capacity to produce the content and the text from the phrases and the words that have a meaningful purpose and definition.

It allows the readers to understand the purpose of the topic matter that the author wants readers to understand. The writing ability of the author is evaluated on basis of the similarities and the differences.

It shows the writer's knowledge, and capability to use the topic to write the matter with differences and similarities. It allows the readers to understand that the writer can use correct grammar, characters, topic matter, and expression of the ideas.

Therefore, the similarities or differences tell about the writing ability.

Learn more about writing ability here:

brainly.com/question/12629426

#SPJ1