Answer:
m<AEC = 105
Step-by-step explanation:
they are vertical angles, so they are the same measure
Answer:
348 trouts in the lake
Step-by-step explanation:
Since this is basically a ratio problem and we are given three values we can use the rule of three to solve for the missing variable which would be the total amount of trouts in the lake. To do so we multiply the total amount trouts tagged by the number of trouts caught later. Then we multiply that product by the amount that were found to be tagged later.
22 total trouts caught later <=========> 11 trouts were tagged
x total trouts <=========> 174 trouts tagged
(174 * 22) / 11 = 348 total trouts in the lake
Finally, we can see that the conservationist would expect there to be around 348 trouts in the lake.
Step-by-step explanation:
y2-y1
----------
x2-x1
-4-(-1)
------------
-4-2
=0,5
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
STRENGTHS
1) Budget is a major pointer to a government's commitment in a particular sector. Money allocated for education versus the %GDP will definitely show if education is a priority for the government or not.
WEAKNESSES
1) The major player, (the citizens) is not the determinant in this measure.
2) Without knowing the actual number or estimate of those who would be captured in this budget it may be impossible to know if education was really the priority of the government. Let's say (X) number of persons will benefit from the education budget, if X is unknown then planning would be on assumptions.
3) Budget alone is not sufficient in determining the commitment of the government in a sector. Laws, policies as well play a huge role and in this research laws,and policies are not part of the determining indices.
