Two benefits of a cloud-based system are data backup and collaboration.
:)
Answer:
What a bewitching land it is!
Explanation:
Just took test
You can write a fictional scene where a king is betrayed by his own son who wants to usurp the throne, and you can use a third-person point of view.
<h3>How to write a scene</h3>
To write this fictional scene, you must first decide what you want to write about. We can, for instance, think of a scene in which betrayal is involved. Therefore, the elements of the scene would be the following:
- Point of view: third person limited.
- Setting: 16th century, Iberian Peninsula, a castle.
- Characters: King Carlos and his son Prince Henrique.
- Conflict: character vs character. Prince Henrique has betrayed his own father.
An example of such a scene would be the following:
- "You?" the king's voice resonated, even though it sounded broken for the first time in his life. Prince Henrique's footsteps echoed in the hall as he walked towards his father, the cold stone walls of the throne room reverberating as if an earthquake were taking place with each step he took. Henrique shrugged, "I'm surprised you didn't see it coming, father." King Carlos could no longer stand. He fell back onto the throne, dropping his sword. Outside, he could hear the screams and the clashing, metallic sounds he knew so well. A battle was taking place, and man against man, sword against sword, violence reigned. Henrique unsheathed his own sword. "I do not wish to kill you, old man. Surrender already." Carlos reached for his own fallen sword and grasped its golden hilt. "I never thought I would have to murder my own son," he whispered. "But you are a traitor, Henrique, and no traitor shall remain alive."
The scene above is simply an example. Feel free to adapt it and add details.
Learn more about writing scenes here:
brainly.com/question/27984231
#SPJ1
Crooks teases Lennie about his lack of self-reliance; he tauntingly asks Lennie what he would do if George were injured. Unable to think hypothetically, Lennie thinks that George is actually under threat. With some difficulty, Crooks calms Lennie down and takes on a kindlier demeanor. His sour attitude remains, however, as he tells Lennie that his dreams of owning a farm with rabbits is unlikely to amount to anything tangible.
Answer:
Not all of the writer’s evidence is relevant to her argument, though. In defending the movie version of the book, she cites reviewer Peter Rainer:
Reviewers have offered equally high praise for the movie. Film critic Peter Rainer notes in his online movie review for the ?Christian Science Monitor,? “the great conundrum of the Holocaust is that it was perpetrated by human beings, not monsters. Few movies have rendered this puzzle so powerfully.” (Rainer, November 8, 2008) It is interesting to note that Rainer has also reviewed Richard Linklater’s ? Boyhood.? ?Boyhood ? is another child-centered movie. (Rainer, July 11, 2014)
Rainer’s comments about the strength of the movie are relevant. But the fact that Rainer has reviewed other child-centered movies adds nothing to the claim the writer is trying to support.
No writer is entirely wrong or entirely right. By applying critical analysis to the full text of a persuasive selection, readers can evaluate the persuasiveness of the arguments. Reading critically is essential for readers who want to navigate their way through published opinions, editorials, blog posts, theater and movie reviews, or any other persuasive texts. First, identify the writer’s claim. Second, examine the supporting evidence for relevance and reliability. Finally, decide whether or not the writer has argued for his or her claim persuasively
