Answer:
Net income = $3000
C. $ 3 comma 000
Explanation:
For a company, net income is the residual amount of earnings after all expenses have been deducted from sales. In short, gross income is an intermediate earnings figure before all expenses are included, and net income is the final amount of profit or loss after all expenses are included.
In this case.. There is only a buy and a sell trade.
Net income= selling price- cost price
Net income= $52000-$49000
Net income = $3000
C because that’s what one way to generate word of mouth advertising
Answer:
a. 19.750 b. 138.250
Explanation:
A. We divide 158.000 by 8 to get the amount per year
158.000/8= 19.750
- Amortization expense (Db) 19.750
- Accumulated amortization (Cr) 19.750
B. On the balance sheet at the end of the first year, we would subtract those 19.750 to the gross value of the patent and the value of the patent would be
158.000 - 19.750 = 138.250
<u><em>Net carrying amount of the patent:</em></u><em> 138.250</em>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The quality should be about the same.
The social responsibility should also be about the same.
There shouldn't be side effects of most products. If you are speaking of medications, there really ought to be the same side effects with the same severity and the same statistical occurrences.
The only difference is the company selling the product.
There have been exceptions to this where different "fillers" were used in the generic brand and the side effects were different and more severe. I've only heard of one case however and I cannot remember what it was. Manufacturers were careful not to let it happen again.
The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
