Why do fathers take an extra pair of socks when they go golfing? IN CASE THEY GET A HOLE IN ONE!
Answer:
A. wartime condition.
Explanation:
The Korematsu v. the United States case of 1944 was a landmark decision taken by the Supreme Court justifying and supporting the military decision to 'intern' Japanese-American citizens. This executive order was a result of the attack of Pearl Harbor by Japanese forces, which led America to take any American citizen of Japanese descent to "voluntary internment".
When Executive Order number 34 came, Fred Korematsu, a citizen of Japanese-American descent refused to comply with the internment. He was arrested on charges of violation of military orders. But even though he brought the case to the court, the court upheld the federal decision as constitutional.
The argument by Justice Hugo L. Black was that <em>". . . under conditions of modern warfare, our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger."</em>
Thus, the correct answer is option A.
I'm not sure if you're looking for a specific answer, but in my perspective...
They are similar in that they <em>introduce </em>a particular topic. Usually both <em>establish </em>the "playing field" the topic will be discussed on. This included boundaries and opinions etc.
They are different in that argumentative thesis statements are <em>one sided </em>and the it's purpose is to <em>defend</em> their argument. They usually begin by introducing a dispute or a question and <u>establishing their position</u>/what they believe.
Explanatory thesis statements usually<u> lay down the foundation for discussion</u> and introduce in <em>detail </em>what the reader and author will ponder. They <em>explain.</em>
