1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
3 years ago
5

Death by crucifixion was never used on a: Roman citizen Gentile Galilean Jew

History
1 answer:
Anit [1.1K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Crucifixion was never used on a Roman citizen, only the people they conquered

You might be interested in
How did russia saw the crisis of ukraine in 2014?
Alona [7]

Vladimir Putin said that Russian troops in the Crimean peninsula were aimed "to ensure proper conditions for the people of Crimea to be able to freely express their will", whilst Ukraine and other nations argue that such intervention is a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty.

6 0
2 years ago
After World War Two the communist party was led by
Vinvika [58]
I think it was stalin not sure tho
3 0
3 years ago
What percent of land did Mexico give up to the United States after the war?
kompoz [17]
About 14.9 % mexico give up to united states hope help you
6 0
4 years ago
(20 Points for correct answer!) As an ardent federalist, James Madison helped write the federalist papers. Why would he argue th
joja [24]
Federalists believe a strong central government is better than a stronger state government with a weak central government, like that in the Articles of Confederation. 
One example of the weakness of the Articles of Confederation, and of weak central governments, is the strong likelihood of state secession, as states are essentially independent entities under the Articles of Confederation.
Another example would be that the Articles of Confederation serve more as a treaty between separate states than a constitution of a unified populace. The ability of states to govern their populace without influential federal interference or regulation basically means they can do whatever they choose.
7 0
4 years ago
Was the Declaration of Independence intended to be a formal declaration of war? Why or why not?
kobusy [5.1K]
No because it wasn't really supposed to be a war but it ended up being one anyways
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A result of the media showing the United States the violence against peaceful protestors in Birmingham was
    10·1 answer
  • How did the coastline of the Confederacy offer the South an advantage during the Civil War?
    13·1 answer
  • Julius Caesar was the emperor to what civilization
    14·2 answers
  • George Washington
    15·2 answers
  • I need a bunch a help I can’t fail this please
    5·1 answer
  • What is the "no pass, no play" rule and why is it controversial?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the attack on Pearl Harbor create a shift in America’s foreign policy (from 1939)?
    8·1 answer
  • Which is NOT a reason to target Japan as a new market? A. Proximity to China and other Asian markets B. Chance to create a refue
    13·2 answers
  • The right of the government to condemn and purchase private property for
    15·1 answer
  • What was the significance of this statement?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!