Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Puritans were concerned that their practices were becoming to close to the Roman Catholic Church.
The answer is A because he wanted to unite both parts of the nation and he said in his speech and i quote "Yet, if God's will that it will continue, until all the wealth piled by the bonds-men's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited soil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn by the sword, as was said '"the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether"' Lincoln says they will not stop until the blood spilled from the slaves is equal to the amount that is spilled by the South if you need anymore help ask me hope i helped you
Answer:
Colonists' pride in their English liberties gave way to dismay when they perceived that these liberties were being abused. People had come to regard life, liberty, and property not as gifts from the monarch but as natural rights no government could take away.
Explanation:
False.
The Jungle book was certainly not about the Busch Gardens.
Instead, it was about the conditions of immigrant workers who had to go through working in factories in the early 1900s. In The Jungle, the book exposes these harsh conditions and included graphic details, which shocked the public.
There is, however, another side to the question. The English stage was most flourishing in the time of Queen Elizabeth. The dramatists of that day looked upon amusement as only a part of their duties. Many men of lofty and penetrating intellect used the theatre as a medium for the expression of their thoughts and ideas.
Their aim was to ennoble and elevate the audience, and imbue it with their own philosophy, by presenting noble characters working out their destiny amid trials and temptations, and their pictures, being essentially true to nature, acted as powerful incentives to the cultivation of morality.
Shakespeare stands preeminent among them all, because by his wealth of inspiring thought he gives food for reflection to the wisest, and yet charms all by his wit and humour and exhibits for ridicule follies and absurdities of men.
It is a great testimony to the universality of his genius that, even in translations, he appeals to many thousands of those who frequent Indian theatres, and who differ so much in thought, customs and religion from the audiences for which he wrote.
