This is an example of a non-disparagement agreement.
<h3><u>What is a non-disparagement agreement?</u></h3>
A part of an agreement, such as an employment contract, separation agreement, or marital settlement agreement, stipulates that the involved parties are prohibited from making any negative statements, remarks, or representations about each other. Such clauses are in prevalent use to prevent (ex) employees from adversely affecting the business of employers with disparaging public statements either during or after the employment period has ended.
<h3><u>What Takes Place If a Non-Disparagement Clause Is Broken?</u></h3>
A non-disparagement agreement is still a contract with potential legal repercussions if you don't uphold your half of the bargain, just like any other legal instrument. A breach of a non-disparagement agreement typically has financial repercussions. You might be required to repay all or a portion of your severance pay if non-disparagement was a requirement for you to receive it, depending on the terms of the agreement.
Learn more about the non-disparagement agreement with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14592097?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
number of products to be purchased
Explanation:
A purchase order is prepared by a customer and addressed to a trader. The document instructs the trader to supply the customer with the goods stated in the purchase order document.
Before a customer writes the purchase order, an agreement is made on the quantity to be ordered. The trader has to confirm that they have the required quantity in the stores, or it will be availed within a reasonable time.
The price is agreed at the quotation stage. The customer first sends an inquiry, which the customer responds to with a quotation.
Answer: Yes they did.
Explanation:
Apparent Authority refers to a scenario where a Agent is assumed to have the power to act on behalf of a Principal regardless of if said authority had not being expressly given whether implicitly or otherwise.
It is worthy of note that this power is only valid if the third party in the transaction assumes from the conduct of the agent, that they have such powers to act.
It is stated in the text that there was no question that the brokers had the actual or implied authority to sell the stock meaning that the Principal had not done enough to show that the agents did not have the Authority to act as they did. For this reason, they can indeed be sued under the Principle of Apparent Authority.
Answer:
4. The total market demand has not changed
the demand has been adjusted by a change in supply
Explanation:
Movement along a demand curve results from changes in the price of the product. Supply influences price change. Movement along a demand curve means the quantity demanded has increased or decreased due to a price change.
A total change in demand is when the quantity demanded changes at all prices. Changes in customers' preferences or a change in the prices of compliment or supplement products make the entire demand change.
A shift in the demand curve demonstrates a total chan