Christin the CEO of a national IT manufacture is experiencing the (B) bounded rationality
Explanation:
By analyzing the options given in the question we can say that
- An ethical dilemma is said to have occurred when there is a conflict of interest between the two organization leaving one with making choices between serving in the interest one the company or feathering one's nest.
- Group think implies giving preference to the decision of a group over individual's thinking
- The concept of Bounded rationality was introduced by Herbert Simon wit refers to the fact that making a rational decision is sometimes limited to the information at one's disposal as well as one's mental prowess.
So the answer to the above question is (B) bounded rationality-Christin is experiencing the dilemma of bounded rationality
Answer:
Robert's interest rate is 91.46%.
Explanation:
Given that Robert has $ 645.42 on his credit card balance, but the payment he needs to make to bring his balance to $ 0 is $ 1235.18, the interest rate for non-payment that he has in his account is as follows:
645.42 = 100
1235.18 = X
((1235.18 x 100) / 645.42) = X
191.46 = X
Therefore, since 191.46 - 100 is equal to 91.46, the interest rate that this account has is 91.46%.
I guess the correct answer is Scientific Law.
Scientific Law is rule of nature that tells you what will happen under certain conditions.
Answer:
involve the current receptionist in the decision process.
Explanation:
When changes are to be made that will affect an employee, the best way to reduce resistance to the change is to involve the employee in the decision-making process.
By involving the employee they will get to see the benefits of the new initiative and this will also convince them that it is for the good of the business and not a ploy to replace them.
Employees have a higher buying and will drive implementation more when they were part of the process for change.
Answer:
D) is 20% above expectations.
Explanation:
The Augusta Division was supposed to earn a net profit of $1,000,000 (= $2,000,000 - $1,000,000). Since the division's manager and his/her team were able to cut reduce fixed costs to $900,000 and increase contribution margin to $2,100,000 (either by increasing selling price or reducing variable costs), then the division earned a net profit of $1,200,000 (= $2,100,000 - $900,000). This net profit is 20% higher than expected, therefore the manager's (and his/her team's) overall performance was 20% above expectations.
