Answer:
Programmed decision making
Explanation:
A programmed decision is one that is done by following already laid down rules and procedures. They are Carried out using formal patterns and the goals here are both clear and specific. These rules and routines in UPS are are a good example of how programmed decisions are done. As it can be seen on every aspect of their day to day business activities.
I may be wrong but I believe it’s false
Answer:
The correct answer is number (2): Limiting public transparency and accountability.
Explanation:
Researchers must provide trust and transparency during their study so the result of the research will reflect reliable information. Accountability, as well, should be present at all moments during the study moreover at the moment of collecting information from the target population and while gathering all the data to avoid manipulation that could affect the outcome of the research.
The correct answer is 3; No, because the Civil Rights Act of 1991 makes it an unfair employment practice for an employer to use different cutoff scores in an employment-related test on the basis of a protected trait.
Further Explanation:
The labor law, Civil Rights Act of 1991, is to protect employers from discrimination in the work force. Employees now can have a trial by jury and can sue for job related emotional stress. There is also a limit on how much the employee can be rewarded.
Employers are not allowed to discriminate based on the test scores that are used to gain employment. The tests must be the same for everyone and can't be changed to have different cut-off scores for any race such as the Scottish-decedent in the question. That would violate the law and make it unfair for other applicants on the job that aren't descended from Scottish people.
Learn more about the Civil Rights Act of 1991 at brainly.com/question/8399959
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
A substantial enough connection with the state.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the Liu filed a suit for Macro sales in a state court that depends upon a website in order to do a business between the New jersey residents and macro. The court also exercise the jurisdication above Macro as if the site interactivity i.e output is depend upon the inputs done seen as sufficient connection with the state
The same is to be considered
