Answer:
A) Adaptability
Explanation:
The company could not adapt to the current trends in the market. organizational adaptability is concerned with how firms could quickly adjust their business processes to changes that enhances their growth and make give them the ability to compete with rivals.
Many advantages are embedded in adjusting to the trend in the market, one of which is:
1. They value their employees
2. They have a well defined goals
3. They become more creative
Answer:
d. has a hostile work environment.
Explanation:
Based on this scenario, it seems that Carz Parts has a hostile work environment. This is a work environment that is created by a boss or coworker whose actions, communication or behavior make doing your job impossible by altered the terms, conditions, and/or reasonable expectations of a comfortable work environment. Which in this scenario, the sexually explicit posters were put up and/or allowed by the boss, and since the posters make Marlene very uncomfortable which prevents her from doing her job correctly the boss has therefore created a hostile work environment.
Answer:
c.$1,080,000 for A; $648,000 for B
Explanation:
For computing the total direct material purchase first we have to find out the production units which are shown below:
As we know that
Production units = Ending inventory units + sales units - beginning inventory units
= 9,000 units + 75,000 units - 12,000 units
= 72,000 units
Now the total direct material purchase for Material A and Material B is
For Material A
= 72,000 units × 3 lbs × $5 per lb
= $1,080,000
For Material B
= 72,000 units × 0.5 lbs × $18 per lb
= $648,000
Therefore, the third option is correct
Answer:
⚡️?
Explanation:
⚡️ nothing has a problem with the battery and the battery is a bit annoying and the battery is a bit annoying
Answer:
$90,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses is:
Using this formula
Risk limitation on losses=[Partnership M +(General partnership interest× Recourse debt agreement)]
Let plug in the formula
Risk limitation on losses= [$40,000 + (50% × $100,000)]
Risk limitation on losses=($40,000+$50,000)
Risk limitation on losses=$90,000
Therefore Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses is:$90,000 and the reason why Jamie’s at-risk limitation on losses was the amount of $90,000 was because of his share of the recourse debt of the amount of $100,000 as well as the cash amount of $40,000 he invested.
