1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
2 years ago
10

Which two sentences best describe the effects of the agreements at the Congress of Vienna? .

History
1 answer:
professor190 [17]2 years ago
6 0

Select all the correct answers.

Which two sentences best describe the effects of the agreements at the Congress of Vienna?

a. The delegates to the Congress suppressed the growing nationalism in France by weakening France's political power.

b. The delegates to the Congress divided France by giving Britain, Russia, and Austria control of different French provinces.

c. The delegates to the Congress made Russia the most powerful European nation by restoring the territories it had lost to France.

d.The delegates to the Congress stabilized the relations among the major European countries by restoring a balance of power.

e. The delegates to the Congress triggered a rivalry between Britain and Spain for control over French trade and politics.

Answer:

a. The delegates to the Congress suppressed the growing nationalism in France by weakening France's political power.

d.The delegates to the Congress stabilized the relations among the major European countries by restoring a balance of power.

Explanation:

The Congress of Vienna was set up to broker peace in Europe after the Napoleonic war by Britain, Russia, Prussia, and Austria.

The aim of this congress was to return things to the way they were before they were destroyed by Napoleon Bonaparte.

Therefore, the two sentences that best describe the effects of the agreements at the Congress of Vienna are options A and D.

This is because they suppressed the growing nationalism in France by weakening France's power and stabilizing relations among major European countries.

You might be interested in
How has the way that we think about and study world history changed over time?
cestrela7 [59]

Historians know that the philosophy and methodology of history have changed over time and will keep changing. Many different interpretations of all historical topics exist. Historians must work to recognize the difference between facts and interpretations in their field

Hope This Helps!

7 0
2 years ago
Discuss the controversies concerning the racial identity of ancient Egyptians. What is the significance of this controversy for
Ostrovityanka [42]
One of the main controversies concerning the race of Ancient Egyptians is determining whether or not to regard their history as "African History" since Egypt is located in what is now Africa. Most ancient historians do NOT discuss Egyptian history as African history, but rather as isolated or, in later periods, in tandem with Near Eastern and Mediterranean history. This is because Egypt was more or less cut off from sub-Saharan or Western Africa for most of its existence. Instead, Egyptians interacted most closely with Nubians and Near Eastern peoples.

This is controversial because Egypt was the birthplace of civilization. Many African-Americans find it Eurocentric that Egypt is lumped together with Western History. Instead, they would argue Egypt be discussed as uniquely African and civilization as an African, rather than a Western, invention. There is basis for this argument as well. Egyptians were most closely tied to Nubians (to their South) by means of trade and warfare. Additionally, while Egyptians had no categorical concept of race, they were most definitely not white and instead more closely resembled Africans of today.

In all, it is a difficult concept. On the one hand, anthropology and archaeology have historically been quite racist, European inventions and thus it should not be surprising how ancient historians regard Egypt today. But on the other hand, Egypt was very much connected to the Near East and, at that time, there was in fact no concept of "Africa" as a geographic space.
7 0
3 years ago
SOMEONE PLS HELP ME I WILL GIVE BRAINLISY TO FIRST ONE AND POINTS HELP ME WITH BOTH OR FIRST ONE PLS ):
Reika [66]

Answer:

The answer most likely would be B :)

Explanation:

It is an actual law and right that you have as an individual

4 0
2 years ago
Which phase best describe teiresias
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:The answer is berry boots

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why do you think the Catholic Church had more influence in Southern Europe
Reika [66]
Because cathlicism started in europe and when you research it europe was a very religious country when they was in medievil age and upto the 20th century
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was Sam Watkins' service as a soldier during the Civil War important to American history?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the geographical region known as the deccan
    12·1 answer
  • The flexible response policy increased the military budget. how do you think this affected the nuclear arms race?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the Marshall Plan?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the middle colonies have such a diverse European population?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the two issues that led to the activism of the members of SDS
    6·1 answer
  • Describe a situation in which you might show filial piety​
    9·1 answer
  • What are the blank spaces?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Kingdom of Ghana grow wealthy and powerful from 750 to
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the inventor of Backwoods?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!