In the passage<span>, ‘The Sand Reckoner” Marcus’s words about needing to disembark contribute to the plot because in paragraph 2 Archimedes is trying to play </span>mathematical games with Marcus<span>, but Marcus is trying to get Archimedes to be serious. He is trying to get Archimedes to understand there’s a war going on and he needs to focus and stop playing games. </span>
<span>Packing the abacus = </span>Facing reality<span>, and </span>seeing that a war is going on<span>, and Syracuse has protected itself. Focusing and attending to the tasks at hand. </span>
<span>Question 72 </span>
What does Archimedes realize about the Great Harbor that brings the story to its resolution/conclusion?<span>
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Writing a Three-Paragraph Essay
As with most essays, the three-paragraph essay has three parts: an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Yet with this type of essay–unlike its five-paragraph counterpart–each one of these sections has only one paragraph. The three-paragraph essay, therefore, might be ideal for young writers or those who are currently mastering the English language.
Another benefit to the three-paragraph essay could be that it requires you to condense your supporting points into just one, which can be a good exercise. If you had to choose only one point to convince a reader to agree with you, what would it be?
After performing some light prewriting, such as brainstorming or writing an outline, students can move right into composing the essay. While this process is similar across the board for writing academic papers, the three-paragraph essay is unique in that the body will take up less space in the finished product.
An outline for this essay might look like this:
Introduction Paragraph
Hook
Background Points
Thesis Statement
Body Paragraph
Topic Sentence
Supporting fact 1
Supporting fact 2
Transition Sentence
Conclusion Paragraph
Re-statement of Thesis
Summary of Main Point
Challenge to the Reader
Answer:
Which pages is the book in?
Explanation:
Not necessarily. the two worlds are portrayed to be opposite just by their names. The prompt is asking how a person tries to be independent while at the same time staying in protective atmosphere
hope this helps
Answer:
He means that in every argument or so, we must take sides, and personally, I don't think his argument is effective.
Explanation:
I'm assuming that Wiesel meant that everyone must choose sides for everything, for example, an argument. But, his statement is not strong enough. One, he's lacking reasons and he must provide sufficient reasons to support his statement. Two, he should be more specfic about it, someone may be confused on what he meant.
