Answer:
c. $24,850
Explanation:
A non-governmental, not-for-profit organization held the following investments: Investment Cost Fair value (beginning of the year) Fair value (end of the year) Stock A (100 shares) $50 per share $45 $51 Stock B (200 shares) $40 per share $41 $49
; Bonds Cost $9,000 Fair value (beginning of the year) Fair value (end of the year)$10,000 $9,950
The amount that should be the total value of investments reported in the year-end statement of financial position? will be the fair value of the investments at the end of the year becaue investments by financial reporting standards are carried at fair values unlike physical assets carried at costs
Stock A = 100 Shares x fair value end of year of $51 = 5,100
Stock B = 200 Shares x fair value end of year of $49 = 9,800
Bond @ Fair value end of year...........................................= 9,950
Total............................................................................................$24,850
Answer:
Long run real GDP will remain unchanged.
Explanation:
The increase in personal taxes (-$20 billion) would offset any increase in real GDP generated by the increase in private consumption ($20 billion). Nominal GDP can be affected and increase by $20 billion, but the effect would be given by an increase in general price level (inflation), not by an increase in real money.
The answer is C because smidgen means a small amount, and if she was not hungry then she would have only had a little bit.
Answer: The Demand should be in elastic
Explanation:
Peacock hotel rooms are a normal good and they have a negative price elasticity of demand, meaning a decrease in price of hotel rooms per night will increase quantity of hotels rooms demanded for Peacock.
Peacock is considering decreasing Prices to $ 175 per unit, for this decrease in Prices to lead to a decrease in total revenue, The demand for Peacock hotel rooms should be inelastic. When the demand for Peacock hotel rooms is inelastic a decrease in price to $ 175 will lead to a small change in the quantity of hotel rooms demanded for Peacock which will then lead to a decrease in Total Revenue.
Answer:
The differences between US GAAP and IFRS pose an extra cost because international corporations must prepare two separate accounting statements. But besides that, other potential risks include paying higher taxes than what the companies should pay int their home countries and the uncertainty generated by changing rules.
Not only do current tax rates affect potential investments, e.g. currently companies in the US pay relatively low corporate taxes (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) but these benefits end on 2025. But also different methods for valuating physical assets and R&D costs can represent higher than expected taxes. E.g. depending on a company's needs, it may be beneficial to expense all R&D costs right away, or maybe it would be better to capitalize some of them after technical feasibility is achieved (IFRS).
The main advantage of having uniform rules (e.g. UCC) is that all the companies know exactly what to expect and how to act. Certainty decreases risk, and less risk reduces costs.
Explanation:
In the US, the vast majority of firms use US GAAP as their accounting method, but around the world the IFRS method is used.
Physical asset valuation is the process of determining the value of your physical assets including P, P & E, and also inventories.
- When valuing inventories IFRS uses FIFO, while US GAAP allows FIFO, LIFO or weighted average costing methods. US GAAP also values inventory at lesser of cost or market value, while IFRS values inventory at lesser of cost or net realizable value.
- US GAAP uses the cost method to determine the historic cost of an asset, while IFRS uses basically the same method but does not include all the costs of location of the assets (e.g. cost of removing or clearing a facility).
- US GAAP recognizes non-monetary exchanges while IFRS doesn't.
- IFRS also allows the cost of asset to be revalued, which can result in unrealized gains or losses. The US GAAP only considers historic costs.
- There are also other minor differences regarding depreciation, disposals and impairment rules.
Research and development must be expensed right away under US GAAP, while IFRS basically requires the same, it allows some capitalization of development expenditures if certain criteria is met (technical feasibility is achieved).
