I have never went and answered these because I was always afraid of being that idiot that is wrong LOL. But I have finally sucked up my pride and saw that this question needed to be answered. So I am answering to the best of my ability. And if I am wrong please feel free to correct me!
Don't go and quote me, but I think these are the offices
-National Security Council
-Office of Policy Development
-Office of Management and Budget
-Council of Economic Advisers
<span>-White House Office </span>
<span>Hope I was of help!!</span>
Answer:
A hypothesis or model is called falsifiable if it is possible to conceive of an experimental observation that disproves the idea in question. That is, one of the possible outcomes of the designed experiment must be an answer, that if obtained, would disprove the hypothesis.
Answer:
Because the power of judicial review can declare that laws and actions of local, state, or national government are invalid if they conflict with the Constitution. It also gives courts the power to declare an action of the executive or legislative branch to be unconstitutional.
Answer: D. advanced technology in irrigation to create agricultural surpluses
Explanation:
There is no map so I do not know which river valley civilization you speak of but I found the options for this question with the answer above being the most likely answer.
The question most probably alludes to the Indus River Valley Civilization which is one of the oldest civilizations to ever exist in the human world.
They had quite a high population for the time and so came up with various technological advances to cater for their people including sewage and water systems.
It was their work with irrigation that earned them high praise however. They came up with advanced irrigation techniques which ensured that agriculture boomed and created enough food to feed the population.
<span>Ralph's attitude is best described as an example of "prejudice".
</span>
Prejudice is a full of feeling towards a man or gathering part construct exclusively in light of that individual's gathering participation. The word is frequently used to allude to biased, generally negative, sentiments towards individuals or a man as a result of their sex, sex, convictions, values, social class, age, incapacity, religion, sexuality, race/ethnicity, dialect, nationality, magnificence, occupation, training, guiltiness, don group connection or other individual qualities.
