Answer:
The appropriate null hypothesis is 
The appropriate alternative hypothesis is 
Step-by-step explanation:
Exactly a year prior to this poll, in June of 2004, it was estimated that roughly 1 out of every 4 U.S. adults believed (at that time) that the war in Iraq was the most important problem facing the country.
At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is still the same, that is, of 
. So
We would like to test whether the 2005 poll provides significant evidence that the proportion of U.S. adults who believe that the war in Iraq is the most important problem facing the U.S. has decreased since the prior poll.
Decreased, so at the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if the proportion is less than 0.25, that is:
Answer:
<u></u>
- <u>Yes, she has enough water.</u>
Explanation:
To <em>estimate</em> the value, you can work with friendly numbers: numbers closed to the given numbers and with which you can perform easy mental calculations.
For example 4.55 may be rouned to 5, 4.85 may be rounded to 5, and 3.25 may be rounded to 3. That yields 5 + 5 + 3 = 13
Then, it seems you have about 13 liters. Is the final number equal or greater than 12 for sure?
To round 4.55 to 5 you increased the amount in 0.45, to round 4.85 to 5 you increased the amount by 0.15, and to round 3.25 to 3 you decreased the amount in 0.25.
What was the net change in your values: 0.45 + 0.15 - 0.25 = 0.60 - 0.25 = 0.35. Those are easy calculations that you can perform in your mind.
That means that you increased your total in less than 1 liter. Meaning that the final total is overestimated by 0.35, and that if you used the real amounts to make the calculations, the total will be still more than 12.
It would be more than one because 3/5 + 3/4 equals 1 7/20
Answer:
A) x > 7
Step-by-step explanation:
Since it's more than, the inequality would be >
Since it's >, that means it's an open circle
So,
x > 7
