Hello. You did not inform the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible that the critical approach that the author used can be pointed out. However, I will try to help you as much as I can.
Critical approaches are the position of a literary critic in relation to a literary work. This approach aims to analyze, question and interpret this work, concluding the concepts covered by it, its relevance in society and its ability to meet the grammatical and literary principles of language. In order to understand which approach the critic used, it is necessary to find his position in relation to these concepts discussed above.
A critic who decides to make a criticism in relation to the way of writing a work, adopted an approach in relation to grammar and textual structure, for example.
Answer:
The type of evidence used in the passage is:
A. statistical evidence.
Explanation:
In the passage we are analyzing here, the author mentions a couple of percentages to make his point. This is an example of statistical evidence. This type of evidence relies on numbers, usually resulting from surveys and researches, to offer support to a claim. If I say, for instance, that 70% of people who eat eggs lose fat and gain mass more quickly than those who do not eat eggs, I will be using statistical evidence to prove my point that eating eggs is helpful for bodybuilders - that is just an example.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. The square root of 36.
Explanation:
If you figure out the square roots of the numbers, you will see the pattern's sequence is simply decreasing by 1 from 10. For the first number, the square root of 100 is 10, because 10 squared or 10 x 10 is equal to 100. After 9, we have the square root of 64 which is 8, and 8 squared or 8 x 8 = 64. Then after 7, it would be the square root of 36 which is 6, because 6 squared or 6 x 6 = 36. Having the sequence be 10, 9, 8, 7, and then finally 6. Remember when dealing with squaring numbers, it's a number multiplied by itself, and with square roots, you find that number and divided it by the given product to get the exact same number. If you need clarification on the difference, please feel free to ask me.
Well there’s a part were they all have to get along
