Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
Another way that media coverage changes the way that judges and juries act in the legal system, is by giving them extra information into the case, or the clients behind the case. ... This means that from the moment a juror enters the courtroom, they're already biased in the way they make decisions regarding the case.
Answer:
available credit -$6209
Explanation:
I'd need to know what exactly are these amounts for. Which are payments and which are charges?
If it's all charges then she over her credit limit and that doesn't make sense.
The total would be $12,209.
Which would make her available credit -$6209
Explanation:
state statutory and common (judge-made) law and private law.
