1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ostrovityanka [42]
3 years ago
11

Which side seems to be at blame for starting the firing of muskets?

History
1 answer:
densk [106]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Preston seems to point the blame on the angry Bostonian mob, they started firing their muskets because they heard some one yelled fire.

You might be interested in
By the end of King Philip II region what has had become of spain
DedPeter [7]
The government should consist of autonomous states with their own customs, laws and privileges i.e. he wanted a federal system of government. This solution was opposed by the Dukes of Alva who wanted Phillip to adopt a hard line approach to bring states under the close control of the Crown

Philip favoured the Alva approach and sent AIva to the Netherlands to put down the revolt there. Alva’s failure in the Netherlands and his recall in 1573 led to Philip adopting Eboli’s idea and he appointed the soft-liner Requesens to deal with the Netherlands.

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME!!
tankabanditka [31]
It could keep people from living there lives
3 0
3 years ago
The Louisiana Purchase was important to the growth of the United States because it
Flauer [41]
The Louisiana Purchase eventually doubled the size of the United States, greatly strengthened the country materially and strategically, provided a powerful impetus to westward expansion.

The answer should be D, Doubled the size of the country
3 0
3 years ago
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois were:
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

2 great leaders of the black community...

Explanation:

...however, they had different thoughts on how to progress.

3 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP IM TIMMED 30+points Do you agree with Emperor Diocletian’s decision to split the Roman Empire into two sections? Descri
Kitty [74]

Answer:

The empire had become too unwieldy to rule by a single emperor. ... The split of the empire allowed the eastern half of the empire to endure for 1000 more years, in part because this region was already more prosperous and better held together. The borders on the Western Empire were far more porous than those on the East.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was NOT a factor that shaped the major differences between the New England and Virginia colonies?
    11·1 answer
  • What were the traditional roles/ structure of a typical family in greece
    7·1 answer
  • the songhai empire was very large, and parts of it were located in the sahara desert. what natural disasters were the biggest pr
    8·1 answer
  • The Nan Song was the first dynasty to allocate a standing army at a port of trade for protection. What would be the reason for d
    12·1 answer
  • How did the slaves feel after the civil war ended?
    15·1 answer
  • Which city in brazil is the cultural and industrial center of south america?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the characteristic of the legal system in the 12 tables
    13·2 answers
  • Plzzzzzzzzzzzz help..
    14·2 answers
  • When did Fredrick conceive that freedom was a possibility?
    15·1 answer
  • Plz will reward the smartest to anyone just answer it
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!