Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Percentage increase in price = 5%
Percentage decrease in quantity demanded = 15%
Therefore,


= 3.0
Hence, elasticity of demand facing Billy Bob's Barber Shop is 3.0
Answer:
A. $6,400
B. $240
C. $1,000,000
D. $30,000
Explanation:
Requirement A, C, and D:
Prizes and awards are taxable income for a taxpayer. Any awards or prizes won from the lottery or television should be added to the income. Therefore, the Winning lottery is a taxable income for Kerry, $1,000,000. Again, Receiving the award for scientific research is also taxable income for Deborah, $30,000.
The winning award for accomplishments is also a taxable income. So, receiving a $6,400 worth gift bag is a taxable income for Cheline.
Requirement B:
There is an exception if the award is for tangible property and a long-years of accomplishment. At that time, the taxpayers will be excluded from some part of the necessary amounts to be paid as tax. If it is not a qualified award, the exclusion will be $400. If it is qualified, the tax exclusion is 1,600. Since Jon received a gold watch for 25 years of service and the gift is not qualified, he has to pay tax for $(660 - 400) = $240.
An organizational characteristics that tend to lead to larger sub-optimization problems is continuous focus on optimizing a unit of a business rather than the results of the entire business
<h3>What is Sub-optimization?</h3>
In a firm. the term "Sub-optimization" occurs when there is reduced level of output as a result of an an inefficient or ineffective process or system.
The problem associated with Sub-optimization is that when there is an optimization of outcome for a subsystem, it may not generally optimize the outcome for the system as a whole.
In conclusion, the organizational characteristics that tend to lead to larger sub-optimization problems is continuous focus on optimizing a unit of a business rather than the results of the entire business
Read more about Sub-optimization
<em>brainly.com/question/17083176</em>