Answer:
Key factors:
Customers
Quality of shoes
Brand (trained with a pro before or used by a pro)
modeling expenses
Explanation:
I believe the answer is Legal standing.
People who had a legal standing are the one that will recieve either harm or benefit after a decision is made.
The amount of involvement that certain parties had in the case will determine how much involvement the party is allowed to influence the case.
Answer:
Decker Enterprises
Based on the projections, Decker will have:___________:
b.) a financing surplus of $36
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Income Statement Current Projected
Sales na 1,500
Costs na 1,050
Profit before tax na 450
Taxes na 135
Net income na 315
Dividends na 95
Balance sheets Current Projected Current Projected
Current assets 100 115 Current liabilities 70 81
Net fixed assets 1,200 1,440 Long-term debt 300 360
Common stock 500 500
Retained earnings 430 650
Total 1,300 1,555 Total 1,300 1,591
b) Financing surplus 36
c) Decker Enterprises does not need additional financing, but has excess financing because the Liabilities and Equity are greater than the assets.
Answer: Antitrust law
Explanation:
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, was a part of the United States antitrust law with the aim of adding further substance to the United States antitrust law regime.
The Clayton Act was to prevent anticompetitive practices. It was enacted in 1914 with the objective of strengthening Sherman Antitrust Act. When Sherman Act was enacted in 1890, the regulators realized that that the act had some weaknesses which made it impossible to prevent anti-competitive practices in businesses so the Clayton Act addressed the issue.
Answer:
If we made the assumption that both countries had a per capita of $15,000 in 1960, country A, which entered an era of political stability, and applied liberal reforms, growing at a rate of 5%, would double its GDP per capita by 1975, reaching a GDP per capita of $31,183.92.
On the contrary, country B, which continued to grow by 1% per year, would only double its GDP per capita by 2030, reaching a figure of $30,101.45.
Therefore, it would take 55 years more for country B to double its per capita GDP level compared to country A.
