Answer:
Mariana trench
Explanation:
it is so far down only 3 people in the world have traveled down there the rest that tried drowned.
Answer:
add why you think it should more colorful and supported details behind it
Explanation:
OK The topic I chose was on if Children should have social media. I said no and here are my reasons why:
*There can be inappropriate content
*People can send you friend requests that are scams
*There are many intriguing ads which contain viruses
*Some things on the sites are really scary or have adult humor
*There can be large amounts of obscenities such as swear words
Children can be too young to understand some things that have to do with the internet like these scams, and some may be too young to understand the some words are meant to be refrained from. (That can be your thesis, and use your propaganda skills to assemble these ideas into an essay that really shows social media is not for everyone. Also remember to include the age you think should be allowed to use it.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
None of them are true except C and boy is it expensive to repair so many thousands of potholes every year.
Answer:
To answer the question, one must define who the market is to the artist.
The fourth paragraph gives us a clue:
"...critics, dealers, gallery owners and museum curators whom they depend on for their livelihood."
Very clear isn't it?
So to the artist the market is made up of:
- Critics: an endorsement by a critic or a poisonous remark (if flipped) can give an artist the break they have been looking for;
- dealers: these category are more like brokers. Buying, selling and consulting on art works for a fee;
- owners of art works: These are direct 'consumers' for the artists products.
- museum curators: this category manage collections of works of art and artifacts in museums. They have sound knowledge of each art work and can also influence decisions during an auction by the museum.
Regardless of their dependence on the above categories of people, the text shows that the artist have a disdain for them.
A possible reason may be found in paragraph 5 :
<em>'In shredding “Girl With Balloon,” Banksy seems to be pointing to a central absurdity of his graffiti art being treated as fine art. When it appears on city streets, anyone can vandalize it; now that the same images are in galleries and auction houses, they must be handled with white gloves.'</em>
In simple terms, Banksy is saying that majority if not all artists don't have a complete say over how their work is valued. There is a system that decides this. And this lack of power or inability to insist on the true worth of their work is annoying.
Cheers!
