Why did Ernesto Miranda argue that his confession was not voluntary?

2 answers:

5 0

Answer: Even though Miranda had written his confession under a statement saying that he was fully aware of his legal rights, his lawyers argued those rights had not been made explicitly clear to him. Under the duress of detainment, they argued, his confession should not be deemed admissible.

Explanation: Hopefully this helps you out with what ever you are doing.

oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Even though Miranda had written his confession under a statement saying that he was fully aware of his legal rights, his lawyers argued those rights had not been made explicitly clear to him. Under the duress of detainment, they argued, his confession should not be deemed admissible. Jun 12, 2019

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Please help me

Licemer1 [7]

D or b ummm cause yeah

3 0

3 years ago

What were three things that freed men and women were not allowed to do according to the Black Codes?

Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

Own property, Buy/Sell land, and walk freely in public

Explanation:

I really enjoy history, I hope this helps!

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The maurya dynasty lasted for

Anton [14]

<span>The Mauryan Dyanst lasted 136 years.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which group of invaders ended the reign of the pharaohs in egypt forever

Alinara [238K]

The Persians (I'm not completely sure)

7 0

4 years ago

Compare and contrast limited government and checks and balances

Usimov [2.4K]

Answer: The Constitution divided the Government into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. Just like the phrase sounds, the point of checks and balances was to make sure no one branch would be able to control too much power, and it created a separation of powers. ...

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago