Answer:
No, lots of improvements need to be made
Explanation:
- A federal law of the US that govern water pollution and aims to provide clean and chemically free water to the nation under the 1972 section, as per the US Environmental Protection Agency.
- Safe drinking water act and resource conservation act have also been implemented along with various policies like water quality.
- T<u>he main objectives raised were to make all U.S. rivers fit for fishing and swimming by 1983, and to have a 0 water pollution by 1985, to stop the discharge of toxic amounts of toxic pollutants in the river ecosystem. </u>
- <u>To date, the U.S. stream and rivers of 70% of lakes, ponds, and reservoirs, and 90% ocean and coastal areas continue to violate quality standards.</u>
Answer:
C. Denmark B. Stockholm A. Olso D. Finland E. Gulf of Bothnia
Explanation:
Stockholm is the capital of Sweden, Olso is the capital of Norway, everything else is history and geography needing long explanation
I’d say C.
A doesn’t make sense, they definitely could’ve domesticated animals in that time.
B doesn’t make sense either, they could’ve easily seen smoke signals, the sky wasn’t filled with them often.
C is just a weird answer. I doubt they were “passive observers” but probably the best answer to the question.
D doesn’t add up because they definitely needed agriculture/food surpluses. They were always hunting, they obviously ran out of food rather quickly.
So C is the answer.
