How did Monet’s work compare and contrast with that of the Barbizon painters?

Arts

1 answer:

expeople1 [14]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Claude Monet and artists of Barbizon school were all focused much on nature and human interaction with the landscape. Their differences lie in the manner of how nature is depicted. While Barbizon school’s idea was more to show realistic nature, Monet’s art belongs to the movement of Impressionism, and he was more focused on the movement and impression of nature, showing the changes and light in the specific manner of painting.

Explanation:

The Barbizon school was the painting movement in 19th century France. The school was centered around the painting of nature and landscape.

As such, it had a great connection and influence on the Impressionist movement. Claude Monet was one of the most famous Impressionists and, as others, based his work on the idea of painting every day and ordinary things, with the accent on nature. Monet has painted many works that depict landscapes, their changes over time, and changes the light makes. This Monet’s tendency to capture nature is the direct influence coming from Barbizon school.

However, Monet’s work is contrasting the works of other Barbizon pupils in the sense that he pained in a different manner and with a different idea. Barbizon painters leaned towards realism, trying to capture nature and represent it as it is. They also made sketches outside but would work on their paintings in the studio.

Monet’s art is focused more on the movement and light, both of the painting itself as well as nature. His work is not realistic, but capturing the essence and impression of nature. He also painted outside, directly watching and reproducing nature, a method which is called Plein air.

You might be interested in

Five words that contain greek or latin root affix for auto

Mariulka [41]

The Greek/Latin affix auto- means self or the same.

- Autobiography: a biography that the author writes about themselves.

- Autonomy: self-governing; the right/power for self-government. In Greek, nomos means law - therefore, it is the power to make our own laws.

- Autocracy: a state or society where one person has the unlimited governing power. In Greek, kratein means ruling.

- Autograph: one's own signature. (Graphein - to write.)

- Autodidact: a self-taught person. (Didaskein - to teach.)

5 0

3 years ago

Fav person from MHA? (With picture)

yanalaym [24]

Answer:

This dude, yknow

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is true of Northern Renaissance painters but not Italian Renaissance painters?A.They painted the Madonna

Paul [167]

They used bright pastel colors is probably my best guess, but if that were the case I’m sure you would’ve picked that right?

8 0

3 years ago

How did pablo picasso and edward hopper take different approaches in the way that they depicted space in their paintings?

Stella [2.4K]

They differ in their approaches in the way that they they depicted space in their paintings since Picasso, space is fragmented and discontinuous while Hopper is known for his brilliant, clean use of color and strong and almost treatical lighting. In addition, Hopper showed the same dramatic light and the image is built from crosshatched lines and it is relating to Rembrandt’s moody etchings in his black and white etchings.

6 0

3 years ago

1. His style incorporated cubism, simulated motion, and fragmented lines and shapes movement and speed 2. He wrote Technical Man

emmainna [20.7K]

1) Italian Futurists were fascinated with politics.
2) Boccioni was interested not in construction of the body but construction of the action of the body.
3) The work of the Futurists was a manifestation of authoritarian politics.
4) Marinetti, the founder of Futurism, hated the past.
5) One of their major themes was movement and speed.
6) White on White was the pinnacle of the suprematist movement.7) Kasimir Malevich’s famous 1915 painting of a square was the color black. Black Square is considered to be the iconic work of Kasimir Malevich.
8) Malevich believed his colored shapes could convey the awe of religious experience.
9) Malevich said that the War was not important in art. Even though the suprematist movement as introduced during the First World War, Makevich thought that war affects people in bad ways while art can affect people only in good ways.
10) Malevich believed that the only thing that mattered was object feeling.

7 0

3 years ago