I believe that the answer to the question asked above is the government is founded in the hands of people who aims to govern another.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
North korea from it's establishment in 1948 to his death in 1994
Humanism is about how in this life they can make the most of their time with themselves and for others. For those who believe in humanism their thought process is human concerns first before anything else such as tradition. How humanism connects to ideas of people changing how they celebrate their faith is that both want to see humanity flourish. Moreover both want humans to reach their full potential even if it means leaving beliefs that prevent it in particular tradition.
Hope this helps :)
The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.
It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.
It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.
