Answer: 9 elm trees were removed.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the number of elm trees removed.
The total number of elm trees in the park is 22. Elm leaf beetles have been attacking the trees. After removing several of the diseased trees, there are 13 healthy elm trees left. The equation to find the number of elm trees that were removed would be
x + 13 = 22
Subtracting 13 from the left hand side and the right hand side of the equation, it becomes
x + 13 - 13 = 22 - 13
x = 9
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
1 plus 1 plus 1
Answer:
its B -15 - 10 = -25
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Each Friend will get
cards.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of cards be x.
Given:
Amount Nicole used to spend on cards = $9
Total cost of one set =$27
Also, she finds friends with the same amount of money to split the cost of a set.
So, Number of friends she finds can be calculated by dividing the Cost of 1 set with amount of money Nichole used to spend on cards.
Number of friends she finds = 
Hence she finds 2 friends and 1 is nichole hence there are 3 persons carrying $9 to buy $27 set of card
Now, Number of cards each friend gets is equal to Total number of Cards in 1 set divided by number of people.
Number of cards each friend = 
Hence Each Friend will get
cards.
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.