Which postulate proves these two triangles are congruent?
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
A = 10.27cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's represent the width as x,
therefore since the length is 4 more than 3 times the width, it can be represent as 3x + 4, Perimeter = 18.4cm
Perimeter of a rectangle = 2(L + B)
width = 1.3cm
Length = 3x + 4 = 3*1.3 + 4 = 7.9cm
Area of a rectangle = length x width
A = 7.9 * 1.3 = 10.27cm²
Answer:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since the p value is very low compared to the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true percent of people with type A of blood is significantly different from 0.4 or 40%
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=144 represent the random sample taken
X=81 represent the number of people with type A blood
estimated proportion of people with type A blood
is the value that we want to verify
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
Alternative hypothesis:
the statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info given we got:
Now we can calculate the p value with this probability taking in count the alternative hypothesis:
Since the p value is very low compared to the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true percent of people with type A of blood is significantly different from 0.4 or 40%