I believe the answer is: controlling ideas
Controlling ideas refers to influencing the general perception that held by other people. This action is most commonly done by monarchies in order to gain support from the citizens to do a certain action.
It also often used to subsequently send a message that government/nobles have higher status in that society that granted them more rights to influence their society.
The later leader-member exchange (LMX) studies shifted focus from describing in- and out-groups to <u>how LMX relates to </u><u>organizational</u><u> </u><u>effectiveness.</u>
<u></u>
The leader-Member exchange idea first emerged in the Seventies. It specializes in the relationship that develops between managers and individuals in their groups. The idea states that each relationship between managers and subordinates goes through three degrees.
The fundamental concept in the back of the leader-member exchange (LMX) principle is that leaders form groups, an in-group and an out-institution, of followers. In-organization members are given greater duties, greater rewards, and more attention. The chief allows these contributors some range of their roles.
The goal of the LMX idea is to explain the effects of leadership on members, teams, and businesses. In keeping with the principle, leaders shape robust belief, emotional, and respect-primarily based relationships with some individuals of a group, however no longer with others. Interpersonal relationships may be multiplied.
Learn more about the leader-Member exchange here brainly.com/question/15706031
#SPJ1
Answer:
It will simply not provide any benefit for anyone, including himself.
Answer:
it would likely overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive
Explanation:
Melissa's tugboat accidentally collides with Tyler's yacht, and Tyler sues Melissa for negligence. A federal jury finds Melissa liable and awards Tyler $5,000 in compensatory damages as well as $50 million in punitive damages. Melissa appeals to the United States Supreme Court, challenging the punitive damages award. If the Supreme Court heard the case, it would likely overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive because punitive damage are awarded if the compensatory damage are deem inadequate remedy and are awarded both to deter the defendant and others from conduct similar to the conduct that gave rise to the lawsuit.
