I believe the answer is: Individualism and federal bureaucracy
Individualism becomes a threat because it make people less likely to be involved in social issues, while federal bureaucracy would strengthen the Federal government and would take away the power to determine enacted law from the people.
Answer:
Poverty and wealth are often found side by side. They are two dimensions in our world that are interrelated because they affect each other and influence both the willingness and capacity of states to ensure a stable global system. Traditional approaches to IR are premised on the notion of state sovereignty. But, sovereignty as an absolute concept that reinforces separation between states has been tempered through the many processes of globalisation, including economic agreements and the establishment of international organisations, as well as with the emergence of human rights thinking as captured through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With respect to the emergence of human rights thinking, the premise goes that in the context of a common set of universal rights based on the individual, the sovereignty of the state can be challenged if a government does not respect or maintain these rights. Here, sovereignty means that a state does not only maintain rights, it also meets its responsibilities. Poor people are cheated out of their savings and the rich flaunt their money like it's honest and hard worked generated money.
The Inuit and Lakota tribes are similar because they both traveled by foot. They also both used animal skins for clothing and warmth.
~Hope I helped~
I think that they are used for fund to make the school neater and for school activities and uniform (and I think a bit extra pay) but more advanced
Answer:
...in China.
...on farms, local and conventional.
...for profit.
...by farmers.
Explanation:
I don't really know what your asking, but hopefully this helps some. If you could give me an example of the larger question, that would be great and I could give you a better answer.
