Given that the jail guard picked the items and still tried to return them back to where he got them after using them, we can agree that
- A. There was no embezzlement.
- b. It does not make a difference that he put the keys back from where he got them from.
<h3>What is an embezzlement?</h3>
This is a term that is used to refer to theft and the misuse of funds or other properties that were left in the care of a person.
It does not make a difference because he should not have used the keys at all. The evidence locker is a place where items do not have to be tampered with.
c. As his supervisor, I would let him go with a warning due to the surrounding story that caused him to do what he did.
Read more on embezzlement here: brainly.com/question/10116585
Answer: False
Explanation:
Guidance documents are intended to assist workplace parties with compliance, but, are not intended to provide interpretations of the law
Answer:
The aim of a privacy policy is to protect individuals and organizations from data protection and privacy violations.
