Civil law deals with the rights and responsibilities of citizens and that formalizes the duties owed to others by protecting people from negligent acts, breach of contract, and similar offenses.
A body of laws or a legal system known as civil law deals specifically with the civil and private rights of individuals rather than the general public. It is typically formalized and focuses on the private relationships between two or more persons.
Civil law is an international legal system with its roots in mainland Europe. Roman law serves as the intellectual basis for the civil law system, and its key concepts have indeed been formalized into an attributable system, which would be the main source of legislation. The common law, that had its beginnings in medieval England, is sometimes compared with the civil law system.
Learn more about civil law here:
brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
by the way you could have used the calculator's fix option....however
in two decimal place it would be 75.88,
Answer:
Generally, advertisements made to the public in relation to the sale of a vehicle or any other merchandise at a specified price are not considered as offers for a binding contract by the courts. Instead, they are generally considered to be invitations to treat or for the public to make a deal. This implies that John's agreement to buy the Wagon R at the quoted price is an offer to Peter, which he is free to accept or reject.
The use of checks (cheques) is a valid means of exchange and is recognized by the courts in payment of the consideration in a contract.
Explanation:
The law of contract requires that there must be a mutual agreement (represented by an offer and acceptance), mutual assent (the legal intention to create a contract), and consideration (the price for the exchange). Since Peter and John did not move beyond the offer stage, there is no legally binding contract or agreement between them. Peter is free to reject John's offer to buy the Wagon R.
Criminal statistics usually categorise social groups according to religion, race, gender and class. But, why are certain groups of people systematically overrepresented in the criminal justice system? We do not assume the existence of a single criminal justice system or definition of crime : both vary across space and time, and levels of overrepresentation vary accordingly. Overrepresentation also suggests two types of problems : groups more likely to commit crime, and those more likely to be arrested. This pieces shows the multi-causality of overrepresentation. The first part argues that these groups are overrepresented because more likely to be arrested due to target policing, and the influence of the media in shaping public opinion (institutionalised racism). An intersectional approach only may fully explain which groups are most overrepresented. The second part attempts to understand higher risk levels for some groups, by exploring structural factors: different levels of inequality, linked to types of welfare states, embedded ideologies (neoliberalism) and approaches to crime and punishment (retributivist, utilitarian). Ultimately, overrepresentation of economically and socially excluded groups is higher in liberal welfare states like the Unites States, also fuelled by neoliberalism and a retributivist approach – the incarceration of those financially excluded from markets committing crime.
