1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
3 years ago
8

Why might done people disapprove of acivil disobedience as a means of protest and of achieving change?​

History
1 answer:
andrezito [222]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Disapprove of a civil disobedience in order to avoid violence.

Explanation:

Some people disapprove of a civil disobedience as a means of protest and of achieving change because they thought that civil disobedience leads to the violence in the country. They want a change by putting pressure on the government through peaceful protests so that nobody is hurt or any property of the people or government is damaged so that's why some people disapprove of a civil disobedience.

You might be interested in
John F. Kennedy, the Democratic nominee for President in 1960, was a senator from
Artemon [7]

The 1960 presidential campaign of John F. Kennedy, then United States Senator from MASSACHUSETTS.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which power of the president allows him or her to appoint ambassadors, cabinet members, and all military officers?
Strike441 [17]
It would be "d. appointment power" that allows him or her to appoint ambassadors, cabinet members, and all military officers, since this is one of the ways in which the president exerts his power over the nation. 
5 0
4 years ago
How did the arms race affect the US foreign policy<br><br> PLEASE HELP!!
Bond [772]

Answer:

I hope it helps u.

Explanation:

Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.

Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.

Mark me as brainlist answer,

Have a nice day,

Thank you ☺

8 0
3 years ago
Help me ima mark u brainlyest
olga55 [171]

Answer:

option d

can u also check my latest question

and can u do what it says plss

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the reasons the colonists gave for not wanting to declare their independence
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

The Colonies Needed England To Protect Them.

The Colonies Could Not Survive Economically Without England’s...

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following nations felt the effects of Clinton's foreign policy? Haiti France South Korea Philippines Iraq Sudan (SE
    14·2 answers
  • 3 what event led to a decisive shift away from isolationism in the united states?
    14·1 answer
  • Which two design elements can be found in the U.S. flag? balance and pattern A:pattern and rhythm B:emphasis and unity C:balance
    13·2 answers
  • True or false: though u.s. naval forces suffered several early setbacks at the hands of the japanese in the pacific, their count
    10·1 answer
  • During the Renaissance, dramatists began writing about
    7·1 answer
  • What sort of crops do the songhai empire grow
    12·1 answer
  • Explain how a democracy, monarchy, or dictatorship may also be a theocracy. Be sure to cite at least one modern-day government a
    8·1 answer
  • What was the effect of total mobilization within germany when did this occur
    13·1 answer
  • Nationalism is the belief that a person's Nation deserves greater loyalty than other groups a person belongs to.
    8·1 answer
  • Which direction on a compass do 90° to 180° represent?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!