Answer:
Two or more dependable sources that record the same event using the same facts is needed to establish historical accuracy.
Explanation:
Artifacts can be open to interpretation because historians need to figure out what they are & what they mean about life in the time they were made.
Although primary sources are helpful, they are not indisputable because one person cannot completely confirm an event. Consider what would happen if future historians only used a conspiracy theorist's journal to figure out what life in our current time is like.
Religious documents often record fictional events.
<u>Two or more dependable sources is the right answer because more resources mean that something is more likely to be true.</u>
Answer: I'm pretty sure it is because they sent several letters to ministers and others on liberty and freedom.
Explanation:
The Delano grape strike was a labour strike by the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee and the United Farm Workers against grape growers in California. The strike began on September 8, 1965, and lasted more than five years. Due largely to a consumer boycott of non-union grapes, the strike ended with a significant victory for the United Farm Workers as well as its first contract with the growers.
The strike began when the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee, mostly Filipino farm workers in Delano, California, led by Philip Vera Cruz, Larry Itliong, Benjamin Gines and Pete Velasco, walked off the farms of area table-grape growers, demanding wages equal to the federal minimum wage.[1][2][3] One week after the strike began, the predominantly Mexican-American National Farmworkers Association, led by Cesar Chavez, Dolores Huerta and Richard Chavez,[4] joined the strike, and eventually, the two groups merged, forming the United Farm Workers of America in August 1966.[3] The strike rapidly spread to over 2,000 workers.
I would go with True because any historian needs a lot of patience to get what they want or to learn about something etc..
