The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
Answer:
D. sharply curtailed population growth.
Explanation:
1. finance , 2. farming , 3. garment
People frequently harbor a variety of biases. Due to author bias, the writers of the two texts present the same event in different ways.
An author who is prejudiced is simply one who, in some manner, did not pay attention to all the facts, or evidence, or build a logical case to support his or her opinions.
In this context, bias is simply defined as when a point or remark demonstrates partiality or preference for a person, thing, etc. When you suspect a source may be prejudiced, when the author's viewpoint is strongly held or skewed, etc., you can usually tell.
Prejudice is a synonym for bias, which means that the arguments used to justify a position are frequently irrational. To assess an argument's worth and validity impartially, the reader must be able to identify any author's prejudice.
To learn more about author bias
brainly.com/question/24460194
#SPJ4
