1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kogti [31]
3 years ago
7

Why do you think governments often build magnificent buildings like Hagia Sophia?

History
1 answer:
forsale [732]3 years ago
8 0
To keep it from loosing popularity
You might be interested in
How has the rise and fall of communism affected the physical, cultural, and
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

Because of the ”domino affect’‘ since Germany is somewhat near Russia and eastern Europe, Germany spread their ideology of communism and it spread unto Russia

Explanation:

Domino affect

8 0
2 years ago
How did france build a centralized monarchy after the wars of religion
wel
The era of 16th century was hugely influenced by conflicts on religion which resulted to wars and the rise of Lutheranism. The disputes that existed during these times prompted reflections on theoretical norms which paved way in strengthening the monarchical power. This had helped overcome the crisis and merged the political situation, internally and externally.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
How was Francisco Franco's rule of Spain different from the rule of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini?
docker41 [41]
A. Francisco did not try to expand Spain’s borders
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did president hardings administration do to influence the american economy after world war I?
Mrrafil [7]
Harding was for expanding the defensive tax. Harding additionally authorized new movement laws. The Fordney-McCumber Tariff was built up and wound up plainly one of the most noteworthy levies ever. This levy was considerably higher than the Payne-Aldrich tax amid Taft's administration. Rather than helping the economy, the Fordney-McCumber Tariff was a reason for the Great Depression. It made different nations increment their rates. The nation was no in conditions like the begin of World War I. Wartime controls were evacuated, the Fordney-McCumber Tariff was built up and movement was limited. Harding understood the greater part of the defects in the administration that should have been settled however he passed away before he goes the opportunity to utilize his energy. The Teapot Dome embarrassment additionally happened amid Harding's administration when Secretary of the Interior Albert B. Fall rented an oil save in eastern Wyoming to Harry F. Sinclair's oil organization in 1921.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the author consider a great accomplishment of rome?
    6·1 answer
  • What are some reasons european colonies acquired overseas colonies
    12·2 answers
  • The major goal of the Progressive movement was
    10·1 answer
  • What was unique about the spanish colonization of the lands of new mexico?
    13·1 answer
  • "I found Rome a city of bricks, and left it a city of marble.”
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the Ottoman Empire dissolve? Empire leaders decided it would be best if they became separate countries and ally with eac
    14·2 answers
  • What is the significance of Pearl Harbor to the ending of World War II? A) The United States immediately bombed Japan, ending Wo
    9·2 answers
  • Claire created a model to study the day and night cycle of Earth as shown here. What causes different points on the globe to rec
    12·1 answer
  • Why was Martin Luther King Jr. in Memphis?​
    14·1 answer
  • How did the printing press cause religious upheaval in northern Europe?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!