The answer would be A. central bank
When making competitive priority decisions the firm <u>"must make trade-off decisions".</u>
Making decisions requires exchanging off one thing against another.
In economics, the term trade-off is regularly communicated as an opportunity cost, which is the most favored conceivable option. A trade-off includes a forfeit that must be made to get a specific item or experience. A man surrenders the chance to purchase 'great B,' since they need to purchase 'great A. For a man setting off to a ball game, their financial trade-off is the cash and time spent at the ballpark, when contrasted with the option of watching the diversion at home and sparing their cash, in addition to the time spent heading to the ball game.
People going on strikes and boy cotting.
Hope this helps
Answer:
<u>Relevant</u>
Explanation:
News, and / or programs on TV, is how media, and the government gives information and influences people. It is relevant for the reason that outlets are trying to influence the viewers, but it is not always reliable. The news, and commercials shown on TV are not always reliable. Politicians may put things on TV, or news that is not necessarily true, or reliable. News outlets also do the same thing. News is notorious for spewing false information. And not only on our presidents an politicians. The point of news is to basically exaggerate things to get hold of the viewers attention more.
:))
Answer:
Yes, the contract is still valid.
Explanation:
Let us first clarify some terms first.
A contract is referred to as a legally binding agreement that is recognized, known and governs the rights and duties of the parties involved in an agreement. A contract is legally enforceable because it meets the features and approval of the law. An agreement basically involves the exchange of goods, transactions, services, money, or promises. In the case of breach of contract, the law awards the injured party access to legal remedies which include damages and cancellation.
Letter of revocation is an act by which a person having authority, calls back or in other words annuls a power, gift, or benefit, which had been bestowed upon another.
Yes, the contract still holds. This is due to the reason that the letter had a date mentioned on it which is August 4, a day before the contract was accepted even though the revocation letter arrived late.
Therefore, as regards to the date on the letter, the contract is still valid.
