If Lyle is concerned about the difference between a company's salaries for its white workers and its Colombian workers, he can place economic pressure on the company by convincing a large number of consumers not to do business with the company by highlighting his findings and creating negative publicity. This strategy is also known as a “boycott”.
If Lyle is a worker for this company he could also, on his own or with assistance from his coworkers, place economic pressure on the company by going on strike citing payment inequalities due to race and/or suing the company.
The 1973 oil crisis began in October 1973 when the members of the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries proclaimed an oil embargo. The embargo was targeted at nations perceived as supporting Israel during the Yom Kippur War.[1] The initial nations targeted were Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States with the embargo also later extended to Portugal, Rhodesia and South Africa. By the end of the embargo in March 1974,[2] the price of oil had risen from US$3 per barrel to nearly $12 globally; US prices were significantly higher. The embargo caused an oil crisis, or "shock", with many short- and long-term effects on global politics and the global economy.[3] It was later called the "first oil shock", followed by the 1979 oil crisis, termed the "second oil shock."
Answer:John is an: Underemployment
Explanation:
When an employee is hired into a job that will not require the use of all their skills and education.
Underemployment is categorised into:
Visible underemployment
Visible underemployment are the employees who work for lesser hours in their respective field. Although they may want to work fully time but they don't find the full time job so they end up taking part time jobs just to survive
Invisible underemployment
Under this underemployment people are employed into full time jobs but still these jobs don't require the use of their skills. John is under this underemployment because he is frustrated that his new job doesn't take advantage of his skills.
Answer:
The opposition of the church that occurred in Ephesus near the end of Paul's ministry is different because there was no arrest made. Paul was not cast in prison neither was he stoned. When the townclerk finishing talking, he dismissed the assembly (Acts 20:41).
Also, Paul never had a face-to-face encounter with Demetrius. But when Demetrius saw the impact of the gospel on his craft, he knew that Paul was behind it then he raised an uproar.
Explanation:
This account of the opposition to the church that occurred in Ephesus near the end of Paul's ministry can be seen in Acts 19:21-41.
