The correct tests to be done in this situation is Electrocardiogram and Troponin test.
Option C
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The person said in this question is having Hypertension along with left sided chest pain. This is by far the most common symptom for cardiac arrest. So as soon as possible the patient is taken for an ECG test, which will tell us the electrical activities of heart along with the muscle conditions.
The second most important test is the biomarker test. Troponin is by far the most used and reliable biomarker for cardiac arrest. This biomarker is found in blood from very soon after the attack and remains in blood for a longer time than others. The most checked troponins are CK, CK-MB and the Myoglobin. These tests are recommended by WHO for a suspected cardiac arrest.
Answer:
correct answer is arcuate fasciculus / uncinate fasciculus
Explanation:
fasciculus is a bundle of axons that connects the area of Broca and Wernicke to the brain.
It is an association fiber pathway that connects the temporal cortex of the caudal and the inferior frontal lobe.
The role of orchid fasciculus is related to one's language ability. It represents aphasia best for language use.
and
The unsaturated fossil is a hook-shaped bundle that connects the anterior parts of the temporal lobe with the inferior frontal gyrus and inferior surfaces of the frontal lobe.
Answer:
1. investigation and an interview
2. investigation
3. interview
4. interview
5. investigation
6. interview
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Answer:
confrontational tactics
Explanation:
confrontational tactics means that the approach was militant in nature involving aggressive and physical standoffs
