1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shkiper50 [21]
3 years ago
8

assess how an anti xenophobia campaign can equip the young in engaging in societal issues Give two answers​

English
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

This campaign would help the young in gathering their own thoughts, opinions, and beliefs without fearing those who are different from them. Those that are different to them would be the adults, elderly, and those from a different culture. Through this, they are unable to engage as they may be criticized, ostracized, and judged based on their worldview. In this case, they let the adults and those who they think have more knowledge in order to solve problems.

Explanation:

This why differences in age, culture, and many other factors stop the youth from engaging in societal issues. An anti-xenophobia campaign would help them gain confidence in reavealign their thoughts.

You might be interested in
How does communicating help you in ur personal life, academic life, and professional life. Give 3 examples.
Reika [66]

ex 1, personal= you could discuss you problems with your peers

ex 2, academic= you could get help from teachers and/or someone of a higher rank

ex 3 professional= you could discuss business ideas with fellow coworkers

hope this helps!! :)


3 0
3 years ago
Write a persuasive paragraph stating your opinion about the importance of stating a recycling program at your school.
damaskus [11]
This is confusing .........
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do yall know what CROPQVS is
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

No clue

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which is a central idea of gates mister jefferson and the trials of phillis wheatley
patriot [66]

This essay is an expanded version of the lecture Henry Louis Gates, Jr., presented at the Library of Congress in March, 2002, as one of a series of the prestigious Jefferson Lectures in the Humanities. In his analysis of the controversy surrounding Phillis Wheatley’s poetry, Gates demonstrates that theoretical issues debated in the academy are indeed relevant to the everyday lives of Americans. Gates, chairman of the Department of African and African American Studies at Harvard University, is a prominent intellectual. In his preface he states that the National Endowment for the Humanities, in honoring him by inviting him to lecture, acknowledges the importance of African American studies in the intellectual life of the United States.

His extended argument is crafted to explain how Thomas Jefferson and Wheatley were instrumental in founding the tradition of African American literature. An exchange of letters between a French diplomat and Jefferson debated the question of the intellectual potential of African slaves. The controversy continued throughout the first half of the nineteenth century and was a central issue in the abolitionist movement.

Gates has demonstrated throughout a prolific publishing career his mastery of a variety of literary genres, from personal memoir to academic critical theory. In this essay he writes for a general audience, presenting his argument in forceful, eloquent prose. He tells a compelling story, with frequent witty references to topical issues. Although securely grounded in his identity as an African American, Gates argues that the reading and interpretation of literature must be free of racial bias. Despite the explosive growth in the past thirty years of publication of creative works and literary criticism in African American studies, many readers will not be familiar with Wheatley’s life and work, so Gates provides the necessary biographical and historical background.

On October 8, 1772, Phillis Wheatley was called before a committee of eighteen prominent Bostonians who had gathered to judge whether the celebrated young poet was an imposter. The larger issue at stake was one widely debated in eighteenth century America and Europe: Did Africans have the intellectual capacity to create literature? At the heart of this question was the contemporary belief that Africans were a subspecies, existing somewhere between the apes and civilized humans. The confrontation between Wheatley and her interrogators was important. If she, an African, could create original literature, she must be recognized as fully human. Slavery, justified at that time by assuming the racial inferiority of Africans, would therefore be morally indefensible.

Wheatley had arrived in Boston on a sailing ship from West Africa in 1761. She was estimated to be seven or eight years old at the time because she had lost her front baby teeth. Although her birthplace was unknown, Gates speculates that she spoke Wolof, a West African language. She was purchased as a house slave by John Wheatley, a successful merchant, for his wife Susanna, who named the child Phillis after the ship that had brought her to America.

The Wheatleys’ daughter Mary taught Phillis to read and write both English and Latin. She was, without question, an immensely gifted child. In 1767 she began publishing her poetry in periodicals and broadsheets, poems printed on a single piece of paper and sold on the street. The public in both England and America gave her poetry an enthusiastic reception. She wrote primarily elegies and panegyrics, or praises for current events and well-known people. Her predominant form was the heroic couplet, pairs of rhymed lines in iambic pentameter, in the style of English poet Alexander Pope.

Placing Wheatley in the context of eighteenth century racial beliefs, Gates draws on the complex theories of such philosophers as Francis Bacon, Immanuel Kant, and David Hume to frame the public debate on the question of the humanity of Africans. He quotes extensively from contemporary texts to illustrate popular beliefs, many of which would appall twenty-first century readers.

In the light of this controversy, Wheatley was a disturbing... (this is a para. offline) not stealing just showing/helping  you 

4 0
3 years ago
Which word best completes this sentence? ______ we can go to the movies, but it's not likely. Probably Definitely Perhaps
trapecia [35]

Answer: Perhaps

Explanation:

Definitely we can go to the movies but its not likely doesn't make sense neither does probably so its perhaps. hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the real reason Victor visits the British Isles?
    15·1 answer
  • For which goal might taking an advanced first aid class be an important step?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP QUICK!
    10·2 answers
  • A picture of the passage is added<<
    12·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from "Black Hole Beginnings."
    10·2 answers
  • What is the meaning of the word fine in the sentence below
    12·2 answers
  • Am I insane if I'm addicted to the pain.
    8·2 answers
  • Give a summary of your day.
    5·2 answers
  • Name three human emotions that might be at the root of conflicts between two people.
    7·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone by James Cross Giblin.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!